We all know the hype of electronic cigarettes being a safe alternative to regular cigarettes, and the effect of alleviating nicotine consumption. The simple fact is electronic cigarettes are safer alternatives that propagate the destruction of addictive natures. Then why is it not government sanctioned yet? Well exactly because they do what they are said to do- allow addicted smokers to quit their habit. Because of this simple fact the government is negligent in sanctioning this healthy alternative due to the loss of money from profiteers.
First let’s go into the entire chemistry between government, profiteers, and their personal economy. Government officials are backed financially by “endorsements” from affluent business men- profiteers. This “endorsement” is truthfully an investment, and they want to make their money back and then some. Whatever is negative for these “investors” (profiteers) the government officials they “endorse” (purchase) make sure it doesn’t come to pass. Whatever is beneficial (profitable) they push for a quick ratification. Makes a lot of inane actions comprehendible now doesn’t it? This is the sole fact behind the government neglecting to sanction a new healthy alternative that will destroy their “endorsements” (revenue stream).
The first fact that should be illuminated about the electronic cigarette market is its anti-consumer proclamation. Every business grows and collects money on the principal of the consumer’s continuous use of their product. Even psychologists—who say they are trying to help—only offer a solution through continual visits to their office. The electronic cigarette market is composed of a collection of companies pursuing the abolition of toxic smoking.
Think about that statement for a minute…. They are issuing a product that will ultimately cease the use of their own product, and therefore their income. The altruism in that statement alone deserves felicitations. The fact of the matter is yes some people will continue to use their product even if cigarettes are gone, but their endgame is one that defies all precepts of economics. Why that just sounds grand doesn’t it; at least for you and I.
Then why aren’t there more studies showing this effectiveness we all know? There should be, but remember the cycle of profiteers. Everything is reduced to profit, and as the biggest investors in tobacco have the most to lose they are the ones stagnating the truth. These are the same people that for thirty years proved that cigarettes produced no negative effects. What do you think they could do to stifle the truth about a healthy alternative that will cost them billions.
It’s called befuddle experiments with misconstrued independent variables. Though it’s a complete fallacy, the masses are duped since they don’t see the implications of mixing independent variables. There is so much evidence of people quitting cigarettes and then stopping completely with the help of electronic cigarettes. According to statistics (profiteers) there is no conclusive test to show any evidence. You know because the millions that already quit isn’t evidence. Not unless it’s done by their cousin Leroy….
Electronic cigarettes are so safe that citizens are allowed to smoke them inside of places where normal cigarettes are banned. Nobody has ever walked up to a person smoking an electronic cigarette and asked them to put it out. No forest fires have ever been started; scratch that- no fires have ever been started by electronic cigarettes. Emissions and consumption is healthy and more conducive to a lush ecosystem.
You can present logic and statistics over and over again, yet the obstinate will adhere if only for fear of their own ignorance. Regardless of what your conception is the simple fact is that the production of electronic cigarettes is for the destruction of harmful smoking. People want to smoke, people need vices and physical catharsis. With the advent of electronic cigarettes people can succumb to their vices and not shorten their life spans.
i am looking to buy a urine test kit